The world lately is in a hype of the development of a new technological breakthrough in transportation field, prominent companies like Apple, Google, Tesla, Mercedes-Benz, etc are in the race to deliver the best and functional: Driverless Cars.
The development of Driverless Cars employs so many frontier technology; robotics, radar, lidar, GPS, odometry, computer vision, advanced control system, space sensing, etc. New ideas of how a car should be able to behave are also tried to be implemented, for example design of wheels that can rotate 90 degrees so a car can maneuvers to its side directly to escape a congestion.
Despite being progressive in terms of technological advancement and product design, the true nature of the invention and development of Driverless Cars tend to be conservative.
It is still the same old anarchic method of mobility; where perception, judgement, and decision making are separated to a lot of brains, either to the brains of the drivers like today or to the brains of the cars later.
It can be good when all cars are Smart Driverless Cars and they are communicating with each other to decide together what would be the best for the overall mobility, the entirety of cars in an area becomes a big single-minded computer system.
But then again it is conservative in regard to the space required per single person's mobility. Personal cars method of transportation relies heavily on the abundant availability of space, namely roads, while space itself are more and more precious for the whole society as the number of population increases.
It is conservative because it is not providing chance and solutions of mobility for the greater population of human race. It is not solving societal problems nor advances their life, it only address the problem of a handful of people that are able to buy the car.
A Driverless Car is still a car and no more than a car, just a luxurious one.
***
However, we are aware that, in a societal construction like we have today, the development of the Driverless Cars are inevitable and required to advances the technologies further, to master them so one day they can be utilised for more progressive means. In a society like ours, technology will only develops where money are invested and there will no investment without promise of profit. That is just the consequences of capitalistic mode of production.
31 January 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Nonsensical Matters
-
Written with the assistance of an AI Introduction: When Growth Stops Explaining Itself Urban growth in the Jabodetabek metropolitan region i...
-
Written with the assistance of an AI Artificial intelligence is often presented as a neutral engine of progress. Faster processes. Better d...
-
12 September 2006 Sungguh. Terlalu banyak orang goblok di dunia ini. Ada terlalu sangat banyak orang goblok yang tololnya mendekati pred...
-
We can't expect high density development in our suburbs because sprawling is an inherent trait of Indonesian new town development. Indon...
-
My entry for an architectural design concept competition for a statue of Jesus in Papua, Indonesia.
-
Coba lihat gambar ini. Ini adalah sebuah gambar yang sangat layak untuk dihiasi dengan komentar berbunga. Bunga-bunga yang indah, yang se...
-
In The Batavia Series we will use historical maps to explore the spatial developments of Indonesian capital, Jakarta, from its founding ...
-
Menyebut apa yang terjadi di Sumatera belakangan ini sebagai “bencana alam” adalah kekeliruan - atau setidaknya, penghindaran dari kenyata...
-
Ada banyak macam pencurian, dari sandal jepit di depan Masjid, barang berharga, perhiasan, hingga dana kampanye, uang proyek negara, dan jat...
-
This article will be a simple causality exploration of why (some) public spaces in Jakarta are (still) ugly, in this case the river. Common ...

No comments:
Post a Comment